JSNA Gendered League Table

HOW GENDERED IS YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITY JSNA?

This league table shows number of gendered data points per local authority JSNA and that number as a percentage of the total of JSNA measures. Where local authorities have the same number of gendered measures we have ascribed a higher position to those with the highest percentage of gendered measures.

1	LB Hillingdon	29	71%
2	Hampshire CC	27	54%
3	Bolton Met	26	65%
4	LB Ealing	24	52%
5	Herefordshire CC	23	57%
6	Wirral Met	23	52%
7	Triborough*	22	67%
8	Kingston upon Thames	22	61%
9	Wakefield City	22	49%
10	Sandwell Met	21	78%
11	LB Richmond upon Thames	21	55%
12	NE Lincolnshire	21	51%
13	Halton BC	21	50%
14	Leicester City	21	48%
15	LB Croydon	20	63%
16	Kingston upon Hull	20	60%
17	East Sussex CC	20	59%
18	Central Bedfordshire	20	51%
19	LB Lewisham	20	48%
20	Calerdale Met	20	47%
21	Blackpool BC	19	45%
22	Birmingham City	19	44%
23	Brighton and Hove City	18	51%
24	LB Harrow	18	49%
25	Kirklees	18	44%
26	Nottinghamshire CC	18	35%
27	Norfolk CC	17	63%
28	Dudley Met	17	43%
29	Stockport Met	17	43%
30	Trafford Met	17	43%
31	LB Hackney & City of London	17	31%
32	Suffolk CC	16	62%
33	LB Hounslow	16	53%
34	Bedford BC	16	46%
35	Blackburn with Darwen BC	16	44%
36	Stoke on Trent	16	44%
37	LB Bexley	16	43%
38	LB Merton	16	43%
39	Worcestershire CC	16	43%
40	Wigan Met	16	42%
41	Leeds City	16	39%
42	Nottingham City	16	36%
43	City of York	16	34%
44	LB Havering	15	63%
45	Luton BC	15	44%
46	LB Redbridge	15	42%
47	Gloucestershire CC	15	39%
48	Swindon BC	15	38%
49	LB Camden	14	52%
50	Darlington BC	14	52%
51	Kent CC	14	52%
52	Warrington BC	14	47%
53	Lancashire CC	14	40%
54	Surrey CC	14	40%
55	LB Islington	14	37%
56	Portsmouth City	14	35%
57	Sunderland City	14	35%
58	LB Waltham Forest	14	33%
59	Doncaster Met	14	29%
60	Derby City	14	28%
61	Knowsley Met	13	54%
62	Dorset CC	13	52%
63	LB Barking & Dagenham	13	46%
64	LB Brent	13	41%
65	Bath & North Somerset	13	31%
66	Liverpool City	12	40%
67	LB Wandsworth	12	34%
68	Medway	12	33%
69	East Riding of Yorkshire	12	28%
70	Warwickshire CC	12	24%
71	Shropshire	11	44%
72	Thurrock	11	41%
73	Isle of Wight	11	38%
74	LB Southwark	11	37%
75	Buckinghamshire CC	11	33%
76	LB Enfield	11	32%
77	Salford City	11	31%
78	Manchester City	10	43%
79	Peterborough City	10	36%
80	Cumbria CC	10	33%
81	Redcar & Cleveland BC	10	32%
82	Oxfordshire CC	10	30%
83	Wiltshire	10	29%
84	LB Bromley	10	27%
85	Northumberland CC	10	25%
86	Stockton on Tees BC	10	25%
87	Rochdale Met	10	24%
88	LB Sutton	10	23%
89	Southampton City	9	45%
90	Cornwall	9	39%
91	West Sussex CC	9	38%
92	Windsor & Maidenhead	9	36%
93	South Tyneside Met	9	35%
94	West Berkshire	9	35%
95	LB Tower Hamlets	9	33%
96	Bournemouth BC & Poole	9	32%
97	LB Lambeth	9	30%
98	North Somerset	9	30%
99	Somerset CC	9	30%
100	Walsall Met	9	28%
101	Solihull Met	9	26%
102	Gateshead Met	9	25%
103	Middlesbrough	9	25%
104	Barnsley Met	9	24%
105	LB Haringey	9	24%
106	Slough BC	9	24%
107	LB Barnet	9	23%
108	Sefton	9	23%
109	City Bradford Met	9	20%
110	St Helens Met	9	19%
111	Hertfordshire CC	8	35%
112	Cheshire West & Chester	8	29%
113	Bristol City	8	25%
114	Hartlepool BC	8	22%
115	Bury Met BC	8	21%
116	Sheffield City	8	20%
117	Derbyshire CC	8	19%
118	N Lincolnshire	8	19%
119	North Tyneside Met	8	18%
120	Cambridgeshire CC	7	33%
121	Plymouth City	7	32%
122	Cheshire East	7	28%
123	Oldham Met	7	16%
124	Leicestershire CC	7	15%
125	North Yorkshire CC	7	14%
126	Durham CC	6	21%
127	LB Newham	6	21%
128	Milton Keynes	6	20%
129	Newcastle upon Tyne City	6	19%
130	Bracknell Forest BC	6	18%
131	Wolverhampton City	6	17%
132	Lincolnshire CC	6	15%
133	Northamptonshire CC	6	14%
134	Coventry City	5	24%
135	Tameside Met	5	24%
136	Essex CC	5	19%
137	Wokingham BC	5	19%
138	Greenwich	5	18%
139	Southend on Sea BC	5	18%
140	Reading BC	5	16%
141	Telford & Wrekin	4	33%
142	Rotherham Met	4	31%
143	Devon CC	4	18%
144	South Gloucestershire	4	16%
145	Staffordshire CC	4	16%
146	Rutland CC	4	10%
147	Torbay	2	8%

BC: Borough Council

CC: County Council

LB: London Borough

Met: Metropolitan Borough Council

*Westminster, Hammersmith & Fulham and Kensington & Chelsea

The Men’s Health Forum need your support

It’s tough for men to ask for help but if you don’t ask when you need it, things generally only get worse. So we’re asking.

In the UK, one man in five dies before the age of 65. If we had health policies and services that better reflected the needs of the whole population, it might not be like that. But it is. Policies and services and indeed men have been like this for a long time and they don’t change overnight just because we want them to.

It’s true that the UK’s men don’t have it bad compared to some other groups. We’re not asking you to ‘feel sorry’ for men or put them first. We’re talking here about something more complicated, something that falls outside the traditional charity fund-raising model of ‘doing something for those less fortunate than ourselves’. That model raises money but it seldom changes much. We’re talking about changing the way we look at the world. There is nothing inevitable about premature male death. Services accessible to all, a population better informed. These would benefit everyone - rich and poor, young and old, male and female - and that’s what we’re campaigning for.

We’re not asking you to look at images of pity, we’re just asking you to look around at the society you live in, at the men you know and at the families with sons, fathers and grandads missing.

Here’s our fund-raising page - please chip in if you can.